The 29th edition of the Hilton Head Island Food and Wine Festival is officially underway. The first event was the International Wine Competition held this past weekend (Jan 25th and 26th) at the Westin Hotel on Hilton Head. This was a closed door event; however I was given the privilege of observing the procedures with the promise that I would remain quiet and not be obnoxious in any way (I did not even dare sneeze.) All kidding aside, just imagine you are in a room with 28 judges, each one pretending to wear a "do not disturb" sign with concentration being the number one priority.
I covered this event last year. Day one was essentially the same as last year. The judges were divided into four groups of seven; with one being the lead judge and recorder. The task at hand is to evaluate over 500 wines in two days and to arrive at a "best-of-show" wine. (It was at this point that I saw a big change from last year. There were less wineries submitting wines in the competition. This was not a bad occurrence because the growers that did enter wines in the competition entered a broader range of varietals. The judges were in agreement that the overall quality of wines too be judged was a significant improvement over previous years.) This is a tribute to the festival. The international producers of wine realize that the Hilton Head event is a world-class competition. Prior to the competition there is a weeklong preparation period when the wines are lined up to be transported to the judges. This procedure has to be perfect and so it is checked many times over. When the staff is satisfied that all is ready, the wines are served to the judges by way of a small pour. The glass is tagged with an identification of the varietal and a four digit number. The judging begins. From the start a very serious silence descends on the room. Concentration and evaluation is followed up with discussion. The judges have knowledge and experience on their side and they express themselves in a very professional manner. Opinions of some of the wines do differ, and why not? Agreement is not always unanimous. The discussion phase is important because the wine being evaluated is going to end up with a medal or be cast aside. Should the wine be awarded a medal, it is then up for additional discussion. Maybe the wine under discussion will be awarded a higher medal. ( A higher medal would be gold, double gold, or best-of-show.)
The above process repeats itself many times over the weekend until the judges arrive at a Best-of-Show winner. This year the winner was Alexander Valley Vineyards 2010 Cabernet Sauvignon; a 100% SINGLE VINEYARD selection. This wine comes from a vineyard founded by the Wetzel Family in 1975. The fruit for this wine was harvested from a single gently sloping vineyard with older mature vines. These low yielding vines produce loose clusters of pea-sized grapes that ripen evenly and have incredible concentration of flavor and color. The color of the wine is a deep purple. The wine carries aromas of black cherry, oak and cassis. The lingering flavors are chocolate and dark fruit. Before bottling the wine is stored in French Oak for 22 months. It retails for $40 and will be available in the Lowcountry near the opening of the Wine Festival in March of this year. A very strange coincidence happened at the wine judging this year. The wine that finished in second place was from the same winery as the winner. It is called CYRUS. This is a classic Bordeaux Style BLEND of Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Franc, Merlot, Petit Verdot, and Malbec. (It is up to the winemaker as to what percentage is used, however the wines are listed in order of strength.) I inquired if this phenomenon had ever happened before – that the first and second place finishes were from the same winery. Not a single person could recall. The voting by the judges on the first and second place finish was close. Some very spirited debates took place. Being witness to the debates only made me feel that the wine industry is very safe; that it is being protected by people with strong knowledge and opinions and that they fear nothing when it is time to state their case.
WINESPEAK A word about the Alexander Valley (not to be confused with Alexander Valley Vineyards). In your search for cabernet sauvignon wines, consider some choices from the Valley. You will find that it is typical for the wines produced there to be very rich in flavor. I was challenged to find out for myself and so I visited the Valley. It was well worth the trip. Your visit to the Valley can be combined with a trip to Sonoma and Napa, as they are grouped together.
Washington State Revisited
Written by Terry Connor
Tuesday, 31 December 2013 14:16
Washington State is home to 700-plus wineries. Fewer than 20 of them are high volume producers. The best example is, of course, Chateau Ste Michelle. Others include Hogue, Columbia Crest, Barnard Griffin, and Waterbrook. These wineries have nationwide distribution with good representation in the Lowcountry. (My personal favorite is Waterbrook.) The remaining wineries have production that is low volume, and unless we go to Washington State, we are unaware of their existence.
Two similarities between Christmas dinner and Thanksgiving dinner are abundantly clear. The majority of us will feast on Turkey or Roast Beef, and there will always be a debate on what wine to serve with dinner. The debate resurrects itself every year simply because we want to get it right. And why not? The holidays are a big deal into which we invest a lot of time and energy. So allow me to get my two cents worth of advice in and see if I can help you come out on top of the debate.
The wine you see here is called a Tannat and discovering it was like finding buried treasure. In all my years of studying wine I'd completely missed out on it. But I have an excuse – the grapes come from Uruguay and France. There was a stimulus to plant Tannat in The US, and it was successful. So let's go back and see what happened.
The above title belongs to Dorothy Gaiter and John Brecher. When they used it, I think they really hit the nail on the head. It comes from a column written for the Wall Street Journal in 2009, in which the writers develop some thoughts on glasses used for wine. For the most part, it's a discussion of everyday vs. formal, jelly glasses vs. Waterford.
I agree with Dorothy and John, but would like to put in my own two cents. In this scenario, I equate drinking wine with eating. We must eat in order to live. To keep our interest in eating at peak, we go to great lengths to be creative with recipes and/or restaurant selections. It follows then – in my scenario – that we do the same with drinking. We must have some sort of vessel to contain our beverage. We select a glass from the Dollar Store (.98 cents) or we can go all the way up and select a glass from an artisanal glass blower. Some would argue that it makes no difference, that glass is glass. That may be so; however, we must consider the everyday setting vs. the formal setting. Let's try to sort this out by starting at the beginning. Yes. Glass is glass. It is composed of sand, soda ash and limestone melted down to form sheet or shapes. Moving right along to our arena we find that The International Standards Organization (The ISO) has a specification for a wine tasting glass. It consists of a cup shape blown in the form of an elongated egg, supported on a stem, and resting on a base. The opening is narrower than the convex part so as to concentrate the bouquet of the wine. The capacity of the glass is approximately 215 ml and the pour for tasting should be 50 ml. Now let's take a look at just two basic shapes – a glass for red and a glass for white. Red wine glasses are characterized by their wider bowl, which increases the rate of oxidation. As oxygen from the air chemically interacts with the wine, flavor and aroma are subtly altered. With the glass for the white wine we notice a "u" shape to the bowl. This allows the aromas to be released and, at the same time, helps the wine maintain a cooler temperature.
I would be remiss if I failed to mention the Champagne Flute. We are all familiar with the shape of the glass. Two points to remember about the bowl: the first, that it is designed to maintain the effervescence; and the second, that it's about offering a view of the bubbles as they travel to the top. (I will wager that somewhere there is a millionaire who thought up that idea. Just imagine the number of flute designs that exist.)
Since I have been studying wine on and off for 50 years, I would have to say that I have been studying glassware and barware for an even longer time. Something clicked one Saturday afternoon, a long time ago, when I was shown a set of wine glasses. I knew that the glasses were expensive, but I wasn't sure how expensive. The woman who owned the glasses asked me to guess the price of the set. I came within a few cents of being correct. ($6.95 each for the goblets at 1959 prices, which translates to $75/$85 today.) From then on I was "hooked," and I always enjoyed shopping for glassware, whether for purchase or just browsing.
I have always held the opinion that collecting and studying wine goes hand in hand with collecting and studying good glassware. When I was a starving Second Lieutenant just out of college, I jumped from jelly glasses to selections from Crate & Barrel. That was good enough until I visited the Waterford Factory in Ireland. Hooked, again? Yes. But what was I doing? I was no longer just buying glassware. I was investing in high quality stemware that enhanced my wine drinking experience. I have since moved on from Waterford. I now shop at Simon Pearce in Vermont and Boston.
WINESPEAK Or should I say, in this case, GLASSSPEAK? Glass is an inert material. That being the case, it will not alter the taste of the wine. What good quality glassware does for me is to complete each wine drinking event. I will now share a secret. My own Mother did the same thing. During the depression, her one treat was to purchase, one glass at a time, a complete service for eight of Water, Wine, Champagne, and Cocktail Glasses. It took forever and her patience paid off. I still have those glasses . . . 83 years later. Glass styles may have changed. Thankfully the idea of collecting has not.